How to Analyze People: 2 Books in 1 - Guide to Reading Anyone with Psychology Techniques, Including Dark Psychology and Manipulation Paperback – July 21, 2019

This book is not only poorly written it reads as if it were translated from an unknown language by someone whose first language was not English. The first part of the book seems to be a modification of something from a professional psychologist manual. The next part is the authors attempt to impress his audience with his wisdom. I have spent much of my life trying to analyze people, and have always been on the lookout for better ways to do so. This is not one of them. It is a truism that many books can be improved by editing. Several of my own books have been improved by editing done by their publishers. I believe the best that could be done by editing this book would be to improve its legibility. The real shame is that the book presents a few interesting ideas. Unfortunately, these ideas are never fully developed. This is unfortunate, as these few ideas have value.

The book is poorly-written and contains typographical errors in the first paragraph of the introduction (and throughout). As you read further, the author dives directly into personality types without any background or credit provided to the Myers Briggs Type Indicator, from which the types are taken. I write this review to make buyers aware that this is clearly not a scrutinized or scholarly text in any way. Readers should take the author's advice provided in the disclaimer where it clearly indicates the book is not written by an expert and is for entertainment purposes alone. After about 6 pages of reading, then some random skimming, this book landed in my wastebasket.

Poorly written. No useful information. First time Leaving a review. I took the time since this was so bad

I was looking for a more clinical book.

Poorly written with surface level and unscientific content. Almost half of the book discusses the Myers-Briggs personality types and reads as if a highschooler wrote it. Don't waste your time.

I thought maybe this book would be a bit more in-depth.

So many grammatical issues. Nothing that a simple google search wouldn’t have. I don’t recommend

Looks good

Poorly written, and rife with spelling mistakes and sentences that dont make sense,- why should i read your book if you havent taken the time to proof read? And by extension if you cannot see to the matter of using the english language then how can i possibly trust the content of the book? The personality types seem to be a 'filler' where most of them are the same, and the information is basic and not written in an engaging way.I read half of it and then thought better of wasting my time, frankly im quite annoyed ive spent the money for such a shoddy book.

Unfortunately this book is not as it seems. The book should not be deemed as 2 books in 1 as it is a very small book of 120 pages and consists of very basic and average material in which you can possess through general knowledge and wouldn't even need to read this book as everything stated in it, is already known. This book states that on the very first couple pages aswell. Definitely not worth the price, better to invest that money on a different book on psycology if you actually want to learn instead of spending money for the sake of having another book on your shelf.

Spelling errors, poorly written. Not sure weather to trust the information of the book as it reads like it was written as high school project (not a good one at that).Do not waste your money !!

The book (or books with it being two in one) are admittedly two very interesting pieces of literature which do open your eyes to paying more attention to the actions of those around you. However, they do need some proof reading as I noticed many spelling mistakes and repetition in these kindle versions which thus made it very difficult to remain engaged in the material which was being presented.

Wish I'd read the reviews first, note to shelf for future book buying on Amazon. Think in future I'll go to the local book shop. As others have said, I think J P Edwin must be about 12 due to the poorly written, lack of any depth of knowledge in the subject matter. I thought I was reading a book for children the type face is that large, indeed its that big I could take my glasses off and still read it.